Thankfully, Obama is not a strong proponent of the 2nd Amendment.
This is another case of the Secret Obama. Here are the words of Candidate Obama:
“There's been a long standing argument among constitutional scholars about whether the 2nd Amendment referred simply to militias or whether it spoke to an individual right to possess arms,” Obama said. “I think the latter is the better argument. There is an individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common-sense regulation just like most of our rights are subject to common-sense regulation.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/legalities/2008/02/obama-and-guns.html
Obamatars, fearful of single issue guns voters like Eric, will tell you that this is his entire position. But people like me, who, forgive the French, don't give a DAMN about your Second Amendment rights, will be happy to learn that Secret Obama believes otherwise.
This time it's not even that secret. The article quoted above gives the gist of it. But I've tracked down several conflicting statements from Obama which prove that writer's thesis is correct. Secret Obama agrees with DC's ban on handguns.
"Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional."
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/06/obama-camp-disa.html
They say that was an inartful answer, and wasn't true. But during a debate, the moderator said Obama believes the D.C. law is Constitutional, and Obama had no problem with that.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Inartful.html
And Obama took a big part in filling out a survey where he dismissed gun rights.
Both versions of the 1996 questionnaires provide answers his presidential campaign disavows to questions about whether Obama supports capital punishment and state legislation to “ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.” He responded simply “No” and “Yes,” respectively, to those questions on both questionnaires.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269.html
Verdict: Political necessity is making him hide the real Barack Obama again, but rest assured, Obama has little respect for the 2nd Amendment. There couldn't be more evidence that this is the case. That's another boon for Obama on my tally sheet.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Obama and Ayers
My girl Sarah has been going around saying Obama is palling around with a terrorist, that is, William Ayers. This certainly concerned me. I want to state that it is very important to me that the candidate to be the President of this country be a patriotic American. (And certainly not a terrorist!)
And this is a huge issue here. It is dominating the entire newscycle day after day, and it is all my friend Eric talks about. He has some real funny lines regarding it, too. So is there a Secret BHO lurking below the surface again here?
Supposedly Mr. Ayers is an "unrepentant terrorist." But I asked the Obamatars about this (that's what we at the Faire call the unflinching Obama supporters) and they gave me some very good explanations. I will link you to one now.
http://audacityoftruth.net/2008/07/24/subterranean-homesick-blues/
This essay breaks down what kind of connection they really have, and whether any guilt really lays on Obama's feet by association.
The answer seems to be no.
Sarah, I love you, but people are already talking about you being unqualified. Now you go around talking about William Ayers instead of real issues?
Verdict: Not only is there no Secret Obama here, but Sarah is embarrassing herself talking about sideshows instead of the economic crisis. Another win for BHO.
And this is a huge issue here. It is dominating the entire newscycle day after day, and it is all my friend Eric talks about. He has some real funny lines regarding it, too. So is there a Secret BHO lurking below the surface again here?
Supposedly Mr. Ayers is an "unrepentant terrorist." But I asked the Obamatars about this (that's what we at the Faire call the unflinching Obama supporters) and they gave me some very good explanations. I will link you to one now.
http://audacityoftruth.net/2008/07/24/subterranean-homesick-blues/
This essay breaks down what kind of connection they really have, and whether any guilt really lays on Obama's feet by association.
The answer seems to be no.
Sarah, I love you, but people are already talking about you being unqualified. Now you go around talking about William Ayers instead of real issues?
Verdict: Not only is there no Secret Obama here, but Sarah is embarrassing herself talking about sideshows instead of the economic crisis. Another win for BHO.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Saturday, September 20, 2008
What does BHO really think about the death penalty?
Candidate Obama has been sucking up to the blood-sucking death penalty supporters.
He would kill Osama Bin Laden.
http://thepage.time.com/2008/07/11/obama-death-penalty-for-bin-laden/
He would kill child rapists, even though they have killed nobody.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/obama_backs_dea.html
However, that same article covers Obama's efforts AGAINST the death penalty, back before he was Candidate Obama.
In the Illinois legislature, he pushed reforms to the state's capital punishment system to prevent innocent people from being executed. The reforms, after a series of exonerations through DNA and other evidence, included requiring police to videotape interrogations to prevent coerced confessions. Obama also opposed a bill to make it easier to sentence murderers involved in gang activity to get the death penalty.
And, how about this straight-forward answer to a 1996 questionnaire?
Both versions of the 1996 questionnaires provide answers his presidential campaign disavows to questions about whether Obama supports capital punishment and state legislation to “ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.” He responded simply “No” and “Yes,” respectively, to those questions on both questionnaires.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269_Page2.html
Verdict: Obama's current position is that he doesn't like the death penalty but supports it for the most heinous crimes. I actually found evidence of him holding this position as far back as 2004, in his debate with Alan Keyes. But he isn't as bloodthirsty as he acts. In 1996, he was against the death penalty. He still mentions that there is no deterrent factor, even while supporting it, in his book, Audacity for Hope. I think it's safe to say that Secret Obama is not a barbarian who supports the death penalty, even if Candidate Obama is.
He would kill Osama Bin Laden.
http://thepage.time.com/2008/07/11/obama-death-penalty-for-bin-laden/
He would kill child rapists, even though they have killed nobody.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/obama_backs_dea.html
However, that same article covers Obama's efforts AGAINST the death penalty, back before he was Candidate Obama.
In the Illinois legislature, he pushed reforms to the state's capital punishment system to prevent innocent people from being executed. The reforms, after a series of exonerations through DNA and other evidence, included requiring police to videotape interrogations to prevent coerced confessions. Obama also opposed a bill to make it easier to sentence murderers involved in gang activity to get the death penalty.
And, how about this straight-forward answer to a 1996 questionnaire?
Both versions of the 1996 questionnaires provide answers his presidential campaign disavows to questions about whether Obama supports capital punishment and state legislation to “ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.” He responded simply “No” and “Yes,” respectively, to those questions on both questionnaires.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269_Page2.html
Verdict: Obama's current position is that he doesn't like the death penalty but supports it for the most heinous crimes. I actually found evidence of him holding this position as far back as 2004, in his debate with Alan Keyes. But he isn't as bloodthirsty as he acts. In 1996, he was against the death penalty. He still mentions that there is no deterrent factor, even while supporting it, in his book, Audacity for Hope. I think it's safe to say that Secret Obama is not a barbarian who supports the death penalty, even if Candidate Obama is.
Monday, September 15, 2008
Does Obama support single-payer universal health care?
He should.
But does he?
He claims he does not. In fact, he offers a less comprehensive plan than Edwards or HRC did. I decided to do some investigating, hoping the Secret Obama that BHO wants to hide would once again come up at the right position. (Only Dennis Kucinich had the guts to support single player.)
For those not in the know, single-payer would take the insurance companies out of health care, and provide health care for all. This is one of the most basic rights a person can have, the right to medical treatment, the right to health.
Here is what I discovered: a speech Obama gave to the AFL-CIO in 2003 - in which he says, "I happen to be a proponent of single-payer health care coverage."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/22/clinton-hits-obama-for-wa_n_82662.html
Obama is now backing off this very strong position. But, with a caveat: In a profile of the Senator in the New Yorker this past spring he offered that, "a single-payer system-a government-managed system like Canada's, which disconnects health insurance from employment-'would probably make sense. But we've got all these legacy systems in place, and managing the transition, as well as adjusting the culture to a different system, would be difficult to pull off. So we may need a system that's not so disruptive that people feel like suddenly what they've known for most of their lives is thrown by the wayside.'"
Verdict: Obama actually wants single-payer health care, as he should. However, in this case, the difference between what he wants and his proposed plan is not because he is hiding his true feelings. It is because he is being realistic, and trying to do what is actually possible right now in this country. I give Obama's health care plan an A+. This is a good reason to vote for BHO.
But does he?
He claims he does not. In fact, he offers a less comprehensive plan than Edwards or HRC did. I decided to do some investigating, hoping the Secret Obama that BHO wants to hide would once again come up at the right position. (Only Dennis Kucinich had the guts to support single player.)
For those not in the know, single-payer would take the insurance companies out of health care, and provide health care for all. This is one of the most basic rights a person can have, the right to medical treatment, the right to health.
Here is what I discovered: a speech Obama gave to the AFL-CIO in 2003 - in which he says, "I happen to be a proponent of single-payer health care coverage."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/22/clinton-hits-obama-for-wa_n_82662.html
Obama is now backing off this very strong position. But, with a caveat: In a profile of the Senator in the New Yorker this past spring he offered that, "a single-payer system-a government-managed system like Canada's, which disconnects health insurance from employment-'would probably make sense. But we've got all these legacy systems in place, and managing the transition, as well as adjusting the culture to a different system, would be difficult to pull off. So we may need a system that's not so disruptive that people feel like suddenly what they've known for most of their lives is thrown by the wayside.'"
Verdict: Obama actually wants single-payer health care, as he should. However, in this case, the difference between what he wants and his proposed plan is not because he is hiding his true feelings. It is because he is being realistic, and trying to do what is actually possible right now in this country. I give Obama's health care plan an A+. This is a good reason to vote for BHO.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Michelle and the "whitey" tapes
My good buddy Eric told me today that Republican agents have caught Michelle Obama on tape raving about whitey. I was astounded. I decided to do some research and I found people talking about this supposed tape everywhere!
BUT NOWHERE DID I FIND ANY EVIDENCE THAT THIS TAPE ACTUALLY EXISTS.
I am not convinced it exists at all, but if it does, I would be very interested to hear it.
That's not the only attack I've heard on Michelle Obama. People around here have been talking about her racist thesis paper. They also say it was restricted until after the election.
This is TRUE.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/thesis.asp
Do note, however, that the Snopes article, while confirming the thesis, "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" was indeed on lockdown, describes the racism as being taken out of context. It appears that it is not racist as the far right says it is. Perhaps some people are just not ready for a strong black woman.
Verdict: There may be a "whitey" tape, but there is no proof confirming this. Michelle's thesis paper at Princeton was generally not racist. Michelle loves watching The Dick Van Dyke Show. I hereby state that the real Michelle is NOT a racist! She may need to work on her patriotism though.
BUT NOWHERE DID I FIND ANY EVIDENCE THAT THIS TAPE ACTUALLY EXISTS.
I am not convinced it exists at all, but if it does, I would be very interested to hear it.
That's not the only attack I've heard on Michelle Obama. People around here have been talking about her racist thesis paper. They also say it was restricted until after the election.
This is TRUE.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/thesis.asp
Do note, however, that the Snopes article, while confirming the thesis, "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" was indeed on lockdown, describes the racism as being taken out of context. It appears that it is not racist as the far right says it is. Perhaps some people are just not ready for a strong black woman.
Verdict: There may be a "whitey" tape, but there is no proof confirming this. Michelle's thesis paper at Princeton was generally not racist. Michelle loves watching The Dick Van Dyke Show. I hereby state that the real Michelle is NOT a racist! She may need to work on her patriotism though.
Sunday, August 24, 2008
What would the Secret Service do?
This is a timeout from your regular scheduled posting to bring you something totally awesome.
My friends and I were pondering a scenario where Obama is in a very hostile crowd. The people are screaming and maybe even throwing things at him, and Obama is really at his wit's end.
At this point, one figure emerges out of the crowd, and he has a gun. But Obama goes right at him and piledrives him into the ground! The gun slides across the ground and BHO pounces on it. He turns and faces the screaming, belligerent crowd. And he begins to open fire.
The awesome hypothetical question is, if Obama is gunning down the folks in the crowd, would his own Secret Service - whose job is to protect him - would they take him down?
Note: I'm not saying this would ever happen, it's just a really cool scenario. Would the SS do exactly the opposite of what they live to do?
My friends and I were pondering a scenario where Obama is in a very hostile crowd. The people are screaming and maybe even throwing things at him, and Obama is really at his wit's end.
At this point, one figure emerges out of the crowd, and he has a gun. But Obama goes right at him and piledrives him into the ground! The gun slides across the ground and BHO pounces on it. He turns and faces the screaming, belligerent crowd. And he begins to open fire.
The awesome hypothetical question is, if Obama is gunning down the folks in the crowd, would his own Secret Service - whose job is to protect him - would they take him down?
Note: I'm not saying this would ever happen, it's just a really cool scenario. Would the SS do exactly the opposite of what they live to do?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)